EBK is a unified database of corruption offenders, containing dossiers on individuals who have been accused or are suspected of involvement in corruption.EBK is a unified database of corruption offenders, containing dossiers on individuals who have been accused or are suspected of involvement in corruption.
EBK is a unified database of corruption offenders, containing dossiers on individuals who have been accused or are suspected of involvement in corruption.EBK is a unified database of corruption offenders, containing dossiers on individuals who have been accused or are suspected of involvement in corruption.
Grigorieva Irina photo

Grigorieva Irina

"A Report from Knyazev" by Irina Grigorieva

Position: Judge of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court.

Sphere of corruption: judicial.

Region of corruption activity: Kyiv city.

Qualification: the actions are qualified under Part Four of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Status: at large.

The plot of the case: in late May 2026, law enforcement officers reported new suspicions of corruption involving former Supreme Court Chairman Vsevolod Knyazev. The media reported that the current judges involved were Zhanna Elenina, Igor Zhelezny, and Iryna Grigorieva.

On May 19, NABU and SAPO announced searches in connection with the Supreme Court corruption case. Investigative actions were carried out at the workplaces, residences, and vehicles of a number of current and former Supreme Court judges.

According to the investigation, three current Supreme Court judges received a bribe for making a decision in the interests of the owner of the Finance and Credit group, Konstantin Zhevago. As reported by anti-corruption authorities, suspicions in this case were also reported to retired Supreme Court judges.

Zhanna Elenina — a Supreme Court judge since 2019, with over 25 years of experience. During a search in 2023, Zhanna Elenina was found with $50,000, $127,750, and €10,000. This money was stored in various places: an A4 envelope, a backpack, and a folder found in the kitchen in a corner of a closet.

The court seized $50,000 because the series and numbers of the banknotes matched the funds previously transferred to Knyazev. At the same time, the Supreme Court refused to seize $127,750 and €10,000 because no physical evidence was found on these funds and they were allegedly not relevant to the case.

Igor Zheleznyy has been a judge of the Supreme Court since 2019. Iryna Grigorieva has been a judge for over 30 years, in the Supreme Court since 2017. Since 2023, Grigorieva has been involved in a corruption case involving the former head of this court, Vsevolod Knyazev. During searches, 50,000 US dollars were found in her and her colleagues' possessions - the series and numbers of these banknotes matched those in the case. The money was seized, but the judge was only suspected at the end of May.

According to the investigation, in March-April 2023, businessman Zhevago transferred $2.7 million to a lawyer through an intermediary so that he could transfer these funds to former chairman Vsevolod Knyazev and the judges of the Supreme Court to make the "necessary" decision.

And already in May, according to the investigation, $1.8 million was distributed between the then-Chairman of the Supreme Court and the judges.

According to NABU, the case concerns 40.19% of shares of the Poltava Mining and Processing Plant, which were purchased in 2002 by a Ukrainian businessman, the owner of the Finance and Credit group, Kostyantyn Zhevago.

In 2023, Knyazev was informed of the suspicion, and the case against him is still being heard at the Supreme Court of Justice. In the same year, NABU searched the homes of a number of Supreme Court judges and seized funds whose series and banknote numbers matched those transferred to Knyazev.

In July 2023, businessman Zhevago himself was informed of the suspicion, and the intermediary was informed in September 2025.

On May 21, the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) imposed preventive measures on two Supreme Court judges in a case of a bribe of $2.7 million for a decision in favor of the owner of the Finance and Credit group. These are Iryna Grigorieva and Igor Zhelezny. The VAKS set bail at UAH 2.5 million for Grigorieva and UAH 2 million for Zhelezny.

On May 25, the High Anti-Corruption Court chose a preventive measure for Judge of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court Zhanna Yelenina in the form of bail in the amount of UAH 3 million.

On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court of Ukraine chose a preventive measure for former Supreme Court judge Oleksandr Prokopenko in the form of bail in the amount of UAH 900,000.

Persons potentially involved in corruption schemes: in addition to Grigoryeva, the corruption scheme also involves former Supreme Court Chairman Vsevolod Knyazev, Supreme Court Judge Ihor Zhelezny, Supreme Court Judge Zhanna Yelenina, former Supreme Court Judge Oleksandr Prokopenko, businessman Kostyantyn Zhevago, and an intermediary.

Assets: In her 2025 tax return, Grigorieva indicated that she owns an apartment in Kyiv and also rents another apartment in the capital. Her husband also owns a land plot and a garage. In addition, the couple has the right to use a land plot belonging to their relative.

Гі (1)Гі (2)Гі (3)

In addition, the couple jointly owns a summer house and a gazebo in the Kyiv region.

Гі (4)

A Mercedes-Benz Gle 300d car (worth 2 million hryvnias), which the judge uses, was also declared as belonging to Grigoryeva's husband.

Гі (5)

The official's income for this year was 5,008,100 hryvnias, and her husband's was 190,682 hryvnias.

Гі (6)

Grigorieva declared 750,000 hryvnias, 65,000 dollars, and 16,500 euros in cash, with 7.5 million hryvnias in her bank account. Her husband declared 300,000 hryvnias and 3,000 euros in cash, with 20,040 hryvnias in his bank account.

Гі (7)

Persons who should have reacted: law enforcement agencies responded to the criminal scheme in a timely manner, handing over suspicions to all its participants.

Scandals: According to media reports, Grigorieva is one of the Supreme Court judges who opened proceedings on the complaint of the head of the Batkivshchyna faction, Yulia Tymoshenko, in March 2026. She, together with two other Supreme Court judges — Oleksandr Marchuk and Vyacheslav Nastavny — considered the People's Deputy's complaint about the investigative judge's permission to conduct a search of the Batkivshchyna party office. At the same time, the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide for the possibility of appealing such decisions at the stage of pre-trial investigation.

Sources:

https://www.slidstvo.info/news/trom-suddiam-verkhovnoho-sudu-oholosyly-pidozry-u-spravi-kniazieva-slidstvo-info-diznalosia-khto-tse/

https://hacc-decided.ti-ukraine.org/uk/news/sprava-knyazjeva-suddi-prokopenku-viznacili-zastavu-u-900-tis-grn

https://zaxid.net/vaks_obrav_zapobizhniy_zahid_suddi_u_spravi_pro_koruptsiyu_u_verhovnomu_sudi_n1637830

https://zaxid.net/nabu_i_sap_priyshli_z_obshukami_do_verhovnogo_sudu_u_spravi_pro_koruptsiyu_n1637367

https://zaxid.net/vaks_obrav_zapobizhni_zahodi_suddyam_verhovnogo_sudu_u_spravi_pro_27_mln_dolariv_habarya_n1637605

https://antac.org.ua/news/suddia-verkhovnoho-cudu-hryhor-ieva-v-iakoi-nabu-znayshlo-50-tysiach-pid-chas-obshuku-v-spravi-kniazieva-mozhe-skasuvaty-nevidkladnyy-obshuk-u-tymoshenko/

https://public.nazk.gov.ua/documents/1f321dec-9464-488b-9e84-d3ea12c286c8

Contact Us

Using this form you can Contact Us anonymously. If you want to receive an answer, please, leave your email