Position: judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court.
Sphere of corruption: judicial.
Region of corruption activity: Odessa region.
Qualification: the actions are qualified under the following articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: Art. 368 (obtaining unlawful benefit); Art. 369 (providing unlawful benefit); Art. 332 (organizing illegal border crossing); Art. 114-1 (obstructing the lawful activities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine); Art. 376-1 (illegal interference in the work of automated justice systems).
Status: at large.
Case story: At the end of February 2025, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office exposed an organized group that helped conscripted men illegally travel abroad and receive deferments from mobilization.
According to media reports, the suspect was handed over to lawyer Stanislav Klymenko, the head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi court, Valentyn Zaveryus (according to the investigation, the organizer), the former head and judge of the same court, Oleksandr Boyarskyi and Serhiy Savytskyi, respectively.
In the Odessa region, an organized group was exposed that worked within the judicial system and helped men subject to military service to illegally travel abroad and receive a deferment from mobilization. The SAPO prosecutor, on the instructions of the Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the SAPO, reported suspicion to 4 persons who are members of the organized group, namely: the organizer of the crime - the head of the court; the current judge - the former head of the court; the judge; the lawyer
According to the investigation, the scheme consisted of making decisions about the alleged independent upbringing of a child by a father under fabricated circumstances. These decisions allowed men to avoid mobilization and leave the country under the pretext of caring for the child. For $3,500, a decision was made in one court session without the participation of the parties, which gave the right to travel abroad. In total, the investigation identified 1,040 such decisions.
For the conspiracy, the perpetrators created a "back office" of the court in a law firm and even advertised their "services" on social networks. Through joint efforts of NABU, SAPO and SBU, 8 members of an organized criminal group were reported on suspicion. In addition, 3 individuals were reported on suspicion of committing crimes related to the activities of an organized criminal group. Three judges received disciplinary action in the form of a motion to dismiss them
Their actions are qualified under the following articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine:
● Article 368 – obtaining unlawful benefit;
● Article 369 – providing unlawful benefit;
● Article 332 – organization of illegal border crossing;
● Article 114-1 – obstruction of the lawful activities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine;
● Article 376-1 – unlawful interference with the operation of automated justice systems.
Three judges received disciplinary action in the form of a motion to dismiss them.
The operation of NABU and SAPO lasted for more than a year. In January 2024, the transfer of an illegal benefit to one of the judges was documented for the promise to make the "necessary" decision. After that, the participants of the organized group continued their criminal activity. Later, in the summer and autumn of 2024, new crimes of the participants of the scheme were documented, as a result of which 9 more persons were reported on suspicion. In February 2025, NABU and SAPO collected enough evidence to qualify the actions of the participants of the scheme as part of an organized criminal group, as a result of which new suspicions were reported.
In January 2025, Valentyn Zaveryukha, a judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court of the Odessa region, was temporarily suspended from administering justice based on the decision of the First Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Judicial Council. Interestingly, Zaveryukha requested that the disciplinary case against him be closed at the High Council of Justice due to the fact that he had been mobilized into the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Supreme Judicial Council denied his request, since judges are not subject to compulsory conscription, and Zaveryukha went to serve just when a criminal case for bribery was opened against him.
Oleksandr Boyarsky was suspended in February. On November 25, 2024, the First Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Judicial Council imposed disciplinary sanctions on Judge Savytsky in the form of a motion for dismissal based on a complaint from the NABU.
At the end of March, the High Council of Justice granted permission to detain Serhiy Savytskyi, a judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court of the Odessa region.
As is known, the High Anti-Corruption Court has set a preventive measure in the form of bail in the amount of more than 2 million UAH for Judge Savytsky. However, no one has paid this amount for him, and therefore the prosecutor of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office will request to change his preventive measure to detention. To this end, the head of the SAPO, Oleksandr Klymenko, filed a corresponding application for permission to arrest Judge Savytsky.
The High Council of Justice decided: to grant the motion of the Deputy Prosecutor General - Head of the SAPO Oleksandr Klymenko to grant consent to the detention of the judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court of the Odessa region, Serhiy Savytskyi. To grant consent to the detention of the judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court of the Odessa region, Serhiy Savytskyi
The court took Judge Savytsky into custody in the case of evading mobilization
In April 2025, the High Anti-Corruption Court took Serhiy Savytskyi, a judge of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City District Court of the Odessa region, into custody for failure to comply with a previous decision regarding bail in the amount of UAH 2.01 million.
The court made this decision on April 4. As noted, the Supreme Judicial Council had previously set a preventive measure for Savytsky in the form of bail, but the funds were not deposited. After that, the prosecutor of the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office appealed to the High Council of Justice with a request to arrest the judge, which was approved.
The prosecutor's motion is partially granted. To apply a preventive measure in the form of detention for a period of 60 days, i.e. until June 4, 2024, to the suspect Savytskyi Serhiy Igorovych. To take Savytskyi into custody in the courtroom
At the same time, the court determined an alternative preventive measure - bail in the amount of UAH 1,514,000. If it is paid, Savitsky will be obliged not to leave the Odessa region without permission, to report a change of residence, to refrain from communicating with certain persons, to surrender his foreign passports and to wear an electronic bracelet.
It became known that Serhiy Savytsky was released from custody after posting UAH 1.5 million in bail.
As is known, the anti-corruption court arrested Judge Savitsky because he failed to comply with a previous decision to impose a preventive measure on him in the form of a bail of UAH 2.01 million. An alternative bail of UAH 1.5 million was set for him.
According to media reports, the specified amount was paid for Judge Savitsky and he was released from custody. He was given the following obligations: not to leave the Odessa region without permission; to report a change of residence; to refrain from communicating with a number of people; to hand over his foreign passports; and to wear an electronic bracelet.
Persons potentially involved in corruption schemes: in general, several persons are involved in the scheme. However, only a few names are publicly known today, in particular: lawyer Stanislav Klymenko, head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi court Valentyn Zaveryukha, judge Oleksandr Boyarskyi, deputy head of the court's staff Inna Taruta.
Assets: in his 2023 declaration, Savytskyi indicated that he uses a residential building in the city of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi free of charge. Thus, the official does not have his own property. Savytskyi also did not declare any vehicles.
Savytsky's income for the second year of the full-scale war was UAH 1,296,313. The official declared UAH 500,000 in cash.
Persons who should have reacted: law enforcement agencies responded in a timely manner to the criminal activities of Savytsky and his accomplices, handing over suspicions to all participants in the corruption scheme.
Scandals: Before the corruption scheme, he was not seen as a figure in other scandals.
Sources:
https://nabu.gov.ua/news/tato-na-chas-viyiny-vykryto-suddivs-ko-advokats-ku-mafiiu/
https://public.nazk.gov.ua/documents/9777ccfa-bdd5-417c-bd6f-0e58c63fa4e5