Poroshenko Petro

Position: former Minister of Foreign Affairs (2009-2010) and former Minister of Economy and Trade (2012), the fifth President of Ukraine (2014-2019), People's Deputy of the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th and 9th of convocations (1998-2014, from 2019), leader of the "European Solidarity" party.

Sphere of corruption activity: economic, legal and security sector.

Region of corrupt activity: all of Ukraine.

Qualification: Petro Poroshenko is involved in many scandalous stories, however, the loudest accusations against the fifth president concern serious articles, namely: treason (Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) and facilitating the activities of a terrorist organization (Article 258-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine).

Status: On January 19, 2022, the Pechersk District Court imposed a restrictive measure on Poroshenko in the form of a personal commitment, he had to stay within the Kyiv region and surrender his foreign passports. Prosecutors requested an arrest with a possible bail of one billion hryvnias. Instead, Poroshenko and his lawyers assured that the process took place with violations, and the people's deputy was not suspected, therefore he is not a suspect.

At the moment, Poroshenko is at liberty.

The plot of the case:

After the end of Poroshenko's presidential term, 24 criminal proceedings were opened against the ex-president, which Poroshenko himself calls political persecution, during his first year as a deputy.

The mass media also reported that some criminal proceedings against Petro Poroshenko were closed due to the lack of a crime.

We collected from open sources all the criminal proceedings initiated by the investigators of the SBI and the Prosecutor General's Office. There are fewer of them than Iryna Venediktova said. However, it is possible that some of the proceedings discussed below were divided into several.

"Appointment of scout Semochka"

This case is the only one in which Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova signed a charge against Petro Poroshenko. The ex-president is accused of inciting the head of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine, Yehor Bozhek, to abuse his power and official authority during the appointment of Serhiy Semochka as the deputy head of this structure.

Poroshenko allegedly pursued his "own interests" in order to concentrate state power in his hands and appoint persons under his control.

A few weeks before the second round of the presidential elections, Semochka was released, but because of another scandal.

Journalists reported that despite the lack of significant income in recent years, the Semochka family owns houses near Kyiv with a total value of about 8 million dollars. The investigation also revealed that the spy's wife, Tetiana Lysenko, has a Russian passport. Serhiy Semochko rejected these accusations.

"43 paintings of art and myth"

The media also reported that investigators are conducting a criminal investigation into the alleged transfer of 43 paintings by world-renowned artists across the Ukrainian border.

Investigators suspect that their import was concealed from customs control. Petro Poroshenko is a witness in this case.

On the day when the questioning in the case was supposed to take place, the ex-president opened an exhibition of these paintings in the Ivan Honchar museum, together with the original customs declarations and documents on payment for them, to prove that the importation of the countries was legal. At the same time, at that time, Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova said that she considered this case "interesting in terms of the circle of participants, the origin of the paintings and the sources of their acquisition."

"Films of Derkach" and Biden"

The Prosecutor General's Office also conducted a pre-trial investigation into whether former US Vice President Joe Biden interfered in the work of former Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Shokin.

He was dismissed from his post in 2016, after corruption scandals. The reason for the investigation was the audio recordings made public by the traitor Andrii Derkach.

On them is a conversation allegedly between ex-president Poroshenko and Joe Biden, who is currently one of the contenders for the post of US president. In a statement addressed to the prosecutor, Derkach insisted on signs of treason against Petro Poroshenko due to the influence of high-ranking US officials on him.

"Counteroffensive in June 2014"

The SBI opened criminal proceedings regarding the offensive operation in Donbas in June 2014. The application was submitted by MP Nestor Shufrych at that time. He accused the ex-president of the bloodshed in Donbas in the summer of 2014. He claims that at two meetings of the OSCE-Ukraine-Russia contact group with representatives of the self-proclaimed "DPR" and "LPR", the participants reached certain agreements, and then Poroshenko allegedly departed from the negotiation scheme and gave the order to start an offensive military operation.

Poroshenko himself emphasizes that he gave the order to de-occupy Ukrainian territory. According to him, as a result of the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces, two-thirds of the occupied Donbas were liberated.

"Passage of ships through the Kerch Strait"

The criminal proceedings concern the passage of Ukrainian ships through the Kerch Strait at the end of November 2018.

According to Andrii Portnov, a former associate of Viktor Yanukovych, who appealed to the law enforcement agencies, this caused the escalation of the conflict with Russia and the introduction of martial law on the territory of Ukraine "with the aim of possible usurpation of power."

Portnov believed that the purpose of introducing martial law was to postpone the presidential elections indefinitely.

"Direct" sale

Also, according to Andrii Portnov's statement, the SBI initiated a case of possible tax evasion during the purchase and sale of "Pryamiy" LLC.

This channel supported Petro Poroshenko during the 2019 election campaign.

Its official owner was Volodymyr Makeyenko, a member of the parliament of many convocations. There were doubts about the latter's ability to buy the channel and they called Poroshenko the real owner. The ex-president denied such accusations.

But on February 18, 2021, Petro Poroshenko said on the live air of the TV channel that in the morning, that day, the owner of "Pryamo" Volodymyr Makeyenko called him, where he said that he had a very difficult financial situation with the channel due to debts. As a result, Poroshenko became the final beneficiary and the official owner of the TV channel.

"Appointment of Prime Minister Groysman"

Another investigation was opened by the SBI based on the appeal of Nestor Shufrych and Vasyl Nimchenko about the alleged "seizure of state power" and falsification of official documents during the appointment of Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman.

According to these deputies, the president and the speaker of the parliament abused their official position, as they submitted a proposal for the appointment of the prime minister in the absence of a coalition in the Verkhovna Rada, as provided for by the Constitution.

However, later, as the Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova reported, this proceeding was closed due to the lack of a crime.

"Yanukovych's Confiscated Money"

At the beginning of 2020, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau opened a criminal case about possible incitement by Petro Poroshenko to embezzle the funds of the offshore company Wonderbliss Ltd by special confiscation of 1.5 billion dollars.

This is the money that, according to the authorities, was seized from the accounts of ex-president Viktor Yanukovych. NABU started criminal proceedings based on a court decision, which was appealed to by an offshore company from Cyprus, which was affected by the specified special confiscation.

In March 2017, the court in Kramatorsk rejected the appeal of several Cypriot companies that disagreed with the special confiscation. But on June 16, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ukraine canceled the decision to reject the appeal. Thus, the special confiscation case will continue.

"Appointment of members of the Supreme Council of Justice"

Proceedings regarding the appointment of members of the Supreme Council of Justice (VRP) were reopened at the request of Andrii Portnov. He accused Petro Poroshenko of exceeding official powers and actions aimed at a violent change of power.

Portnov claimed that Petro Poroshenko changed the procedure for appointing members of the Council during the relevant competition, which allowed him to appoint them outside the competition. Petro Poroshenko himself claimed that he acted in accordance with the law.

The investigators also closed this criminal proceeding due to the lack of a crime.

"Pressure on judges in the PrivatBank case"

The SBI studied the statement of the judges of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv, who claimed that they were under pressure because of Petro Poroshenko's statements after their decision in the "PrivatBank" case.

The judges satisfied one of the claims of the former owner of "PrivatBank" Igor Kolomoisky against the National Bank and the government regarding nationalization in 2016. The National Bank and the Cabinet of Ministers appealed this decision, and President Poroshenko at a special meeting allegedly called to "check" the judges who ruled in favor of Kolomoiskyi.

Petro Poroshenko denied the pressure on judges and assured that threats and risks related to the possible execution of the court's decision were discussed at the mentioned meeting.

The Prosecutor General reported that the proceedings were closed due to the lack of a crime.

"Untimely appointment of judges"

Several other proceedings investigated by the SBI also concern judges. It is about the possible abuse of official powers by Petro Poroshenko, as the ex-president allegedly did not appoint judges recommended by the Supreme Council of Justice in a timely manner.

These people received salaries without exercising their powers, so the ex-president's actions allegedly also led to losses to the state budget. Now former Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova reported at the time that she opened five similar proceedings.

"Situational room in OPU"

The SBI conducted a pre-trial investigation into the disappearance of monitors and servers from the presidential administration, under the article "loss of documents containing state secrets". It is said that after coming to power, Volodymyr Zelenskyi's team accused its predecessors of removing all equipment, including servers, from the meeting room - the so-called situational room.

The press service of Petro Poroshenko assured that the equipment was rented by the president at his own expense, so it was taken away to be returned to the lessor.

"Sale of "Forge" Tigipku"

The SBI is investigating the circumstances of the sale agreement in 2018 of the Kyiv plant "Kuznia na Rybalskyi". Petro Poroshenko, who was the owner of the enterprise, sold it to Ukrainian businessman and ex-government official Serhii Tihipko.

Andriy Portnov, as the applicant in this case, claimed that the sale of the plant was fictitious, the ex-president could have remained the actual owner of the plant, and the 300 million dollars allegedly paid for the enterprise were probably "laundered" through Cypriot offshores. Petro Poroshenko's lawyer Ihor Golovan calls the sale of "Kuzna" super transparent.

"Vacation in the Maldives and "fake" documents"

The SBI is investigating the information that appeared in the media about the alleged illegal crossing of the state border of Ukraine by Petro Poroshenko and his family, using forged documents.

Journalists claimed that the Poroshenkos vacationed in the Maldives in January 2018, and the president flew as "Mr. Petro Incognito." At the same time, Poroshenko assured that he flew on vacation with his passport and with the appropriate registration with the border guards.

"Deportation of Saakashvili"

The SBI is also investigating the proceedings regarding the illegal detention of Mikheil Saakashvili and his deportation outside Ukraine.

The former president of Georgia, after working in the president's team, joined the opposition in 2016.

In July 2017, Poroshenko stripped Saakashvili of Ukrainian citizenship while he was in the United States. However, even after that, the politician returned to Ukraine, crossing the Ukrainian-Polish border.

In February 2018, he was detained in Kyiv and sent to Poland as a border violator.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court of Ukraine ruled that the readmission of Mr. Saakashvili was legal. However, the new president, Volodymyr Zelenskyi, returned his Ukrainian citizenship.

"The Escape of Judge Chause"

The SBI is investigating the possible involvement of Petro Poroshenko in the illegal transfer of judge Mykola Chaus to Moldova. Such suspicions are probably based on the statements of former high-ranking police official Anton Shevtsov, who said that Poroshenko's personal bodyguards helped Chaus escape. Judge Chaus was suspected of receiving a bribe in the amount of 150,000 dollars. The ex-president claimed that he did not know who Chaus was and was not involved in his escape.

"Ivushka Base"

The SBI is investigating the fate of the "Ivushka" recreation center of the Ukrainian Society of the Blind, located in the elite Kozyna near Kyiv. It is in this village that Petro Poroshenko has a house.

The mass media wrote that the territory of this base was fraudulently taken over by officials of Soyuz-invest LLC, which was associated with Petro Poroshenko.

"Transfer of land in Mykolaiv Oblast"

In 2016, Petro Poroshenko canceled the decision of the head of one of the district administrations of the Mykolaiv region to transfer a plot of agricultural land with an area of 1,500 hectares to the land of the state reserve.

The applicant - one of Viktor Yanukovych's associates, regional representative Mykhailo Dobkin believed that this was an excess of the president's powers.

Petro Poroshenko himself claimed that he made the decision in response to the request of the deputy Ihor Lutsenko, who was addressed by the residents of the Mykolaiv region.

"Tomos"

It also became known to the mass media that the State Bureau of Investigation is investigating the case regarding the receipt by the Orthodox Church of Ukraine of a tomos on autocephaly.

"On November 6, 2019, the SBU began an investigation based on the statement of believers of the Kyiv Patriarchate of the UOC into the illegal actions of a number of senior officials who committed actions aimed at inciting inter-religious enmity during the creation of the OCU. The SBU then transferred the case to the SBU for investigation," the SBU reported.

"High treason"

All attempts to bring Petro Poroshenko to criminal responsibility in 2020 were unsuccessful, however, in 2021 they tried to imprison Petro Poroshenko in the case of the purchase of coal from "DPR" and "LPR" during 2014-2015.

The circle around Poroshenko narrowed, and finally, on December 20, 2021, the SBI announced that it had served him with suspicion of treason by mail.

He himself went abroad on business on December 17, 2021 and is going to return only after the New Year holidays.

These accusations are extremely serious, in fact, Poroshenko was accused of colluding with Russia and the militants of the DPR and LPR simply during the 2014-2015 hostilities.

Petro Poroshenko was charged under two articles of the criminal code: "treason" and "facilitating the activities of terrorist organizations."

According to the investigation, a number of high-ranking citizens of Ukraine conspired to support "terrorist organizations" in order to harm the territorial integrity, inviolability and defense capability of Ukraine.

These conspirators were the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk, Petro Poroshenko, the then Minister of Energy Volodymyr Demchyshyn and the "communicator" with the militants Serhiy Kuzyara.

In the end, in the winter of 2022, just weeks before the full-scale invasion, a court hearing regarding Poroshenko's case did take place. the prosecutor's office asked to send Poroshenko under arrest with an alternative bail of 1 billion hryvnias.

However, the court made a different decision — a personal commitment. Being under a personal obligation, Poroshenko had to come to the investigator and the court at the first summons, not to leave Kyiv and the Kyiv region without permission, to notify about a change of place of residence or work, to hand in foreign passports.

The preventive measure was in effect until March 19, 2022. As of now, Poroshenko is at liberty.

Persons potentially involved in corruption: during his term of office, Poroshenko gradually formed around himself an analogue of "dear friends" whose close circle included: at that time deputies Ihor Kononenko, Oleksandr Granovsky, Serhiy Berezenko, as well as the first deputy secretary of the National Security Council and of Defense Oleg Svynarchuk-Hladkovskyi, the head of the administration of President Petro Poroshenko Boris Lozhkin and the deputy head of Poroshenko's AP — Oleksiy Filatov. These are figures who, according to journalists, controlled all important political and financial processes.

Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman was the main representative of Poroshenko in the Cabinet at that time, and the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko was responsible for the power bloc at that time.

As a result, during his tenure, Petro Poroshenko gained control over the Cabinet of Ministers, GPU, SBU, courts and the Verkhovna Rada. That is, by all branches of government.

In the end, it was the ex-president's "dear friends" who in the future became involved in high-profile criminal proceedings and became one of the reasons for Poroshenko's downfall in the 2019 presidential elections.

Wealth: People's Deputy Petro Poroshenko is among the top three richest Ukrainians, along with Viktor Pinchuk and Rinat Akhmetov.

During the year of the war, Poroshenko's wealth increased by 224 million dollars and is almost 1 billion dollars.

Among real estate properties, the Poroshenko family owns a residential building and two plots of land in Kozyna, a house and four plots of land in Kyiv and the region, as well as three apartments in the capital and Vinnytsia.

Poroshenko and his family own a Jaguar and two Mercedes-Benz. Also, the politician, in particular, declared collections of paintings, watches, jewelry and furniture.

Recently, a scandal broke out around Poroshenko's wealth. According to data from the NAKC, Poroshenko received more than 37 million hryvnias from the pro-Russian government of Viktor Orban. This happened a week before Poroshenko tried to go abroad for talks with Orban. Then the border guards did not let the people's deputy out of the country, because the Ukrainian special services received information that his visit to Hungary could be used by the Russian FSB and the GRU.

Scandals: if you look retrospectively at Petro Poroshenko's tenure, his presidency is a complete scandal. However, we found the ones that hit his presidential rating the hardest.

The main scandals involving Petro Poroshenko and his entourage from 2014 to 2019:

1. May 2014 - "Vienna Oligarchic Consensus" .

On the eve of the President's inauguration, oligarch Dmytro Firtash said that Petro Poroshenko was elected president as a result of the consensus of the main Ukrainian oligarchs. In addition, Firtash convinced his client Vitaliy Klitschko, who in 2014 had the highest ratings among the democratic opposition, not to run in the elections. As a result, Klitschko was elected mayor of Kyiv, and Poroshenko was elected president.

2. June 2014 - "Beginning of systemic cooperation between the President and Viktor Medvedchuk" .

At the invitation of Petro Poroshenko, Viktor Medvedchuk began to perform the functions of a negotiating channel with Russia and the self-proclaimed "DPR-LPR". Starting from 2015, Petro Poroshenko and Viktor Medvedchuk started doing oil and gas business together, and Putin's godfather turned into a monopolist in the Ukrainian liquefied gas market. In 2017-2018, Medvedchuk, with the support of Petro Poroshenko, acquired TV channels 112 and News One. Viktor Medvedchuk continues to be a negotiator in the Minsk Group, and in fact enjoys political immunity in Ukraine.

3. August 2014 - "Poroshenko's refusal to sell his business" .

In July 2014, Petro Poroshenko told journalists that he would not sell his entire business because of the bad international economic situation. Although it is known that the Nestle corporation even in 2015 offered Poroshenko to buy his company "Roshen" for 1 billion dollars. Political rivals and public activists constantly criticize Petro Poroshenko for using political influence to increase the profits of his companies and those around him.

4. October 2014 - "Resignation of Minister of Defense Valery Geletei" .

One of the first scandals surrounding Poroshenko's personnel decision, which led to the Ilovai encirclement and other heavy losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the summer campaign in Donbas. Valery Geletey was responsible for the protection of Petro Poroshenko for a long time, and thanks to his loyalty, he was appointed Minister of Defense in 2014. Volunteers, politicians and senior military officers demanded Geletei's resignation. At the moment, Valery Geletey heads the State Security Service, which is fully focused on protecting the President during rallies.

5. March 2015 - "Conflict of the President with Igor Kolomoisky" .

Since March 2015, Poroshenko entered into a long-term confrontation with Kolomoisky, which was accompanied by the resignation of Kolomoisky and Ihor Palytsa from the positions of heads of the Dnipropetrovsk and Odesa regional administrations. Subsequently, under pressure from Poroshenko, Kolomoisky lost control and representation in the state companies "UKRNAFTA" and "UKRTRANSNAFTA", "NAK-NAFTOGAZ", "Odesa Port Plant" and other small state enterprises during 2015-2017. Media holding 1+1 is also at risk. However, the main loss for Kolomoisky is the nationalization of PRIVATBANK bank in 2017.

6. Summer of 2015 - "Disbandment of volunteer battalions, persecution of volunteers and veterans" .

The process of disbanding the volunteer battalions "Right Sector", "Dnipro-1", "Dnipro-2", "Tornado" company, etc. This procedure was accompanied by court proceedings, searches by security forces, protests and conflicts between nationalists and law enforcement agencies. The regiment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs - "Azov" remained the only volunteer formation that was able to legalize itself and maintain its subjectivity in the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The apogee of Poroshenko's confrontation with the nationalists was the terrorist attack (a grenade explosion) on August 31, 2015 near the Verkhovna Rada during the first reading vote for changes to the Constitution in terms of decentralization of power.

7. January-March 2016 - "Conflict between the President and the Prime Minister."

Arseniy Yatsenyuk accused Petro Poroshenko of ordering and organizing political discrediting, which caused his resignation from the post of Prime Minister in April 2016. Later, this information was confirmed by Oleksandr Onyshchenko, who said that he had spent $40 million on Poroshenko's instructions to discredit Yatsenyuk. Political relations between Yatsenyuk and Poroshenko are unfriendly to this day.

8. April 2016 - "Panama Papers scandal" .

A group of international journalists published information about Petro Poroshenko's offshore business and foreign accounts. Information that the president's lawyers were creating another offshore company on the day of the encirclement of Ukrainian troops by the Russians near Ilovaisk in August 2014 received a special resonance. Ukrainian journalists came to the conclusion that Petro Poroshenko reduced the tax burden on his business with the help of offshore companies, and also legalized abroad the funds that were obtained in Ukraine in a non-transparent way.

9. May 2016 - "Appointment of Yury Lutsenko as the Prosecutor General of Ukraine" .

Yurii Lutsenko did not meet the legal criteria and qualification requirements for the position of Prosecutor General, as he did not have a legal education and 15 years of experience in the prosecutor's office. Because of this personnel decision, the parliament, under pressure from the President's Administration, changed the legislation. Later, in 2018, the oligarch Onishchenko said that the appointment of the President's best man to the position of Prosecutor General in the Verkhovna Rada cost Petro Poroshenko 10 million dollars.

May 10, 2016 - "the implementation of the Rotterdam + corruption formula" .

"Rotterdam plus" is a method of forming the price of the fuel component (coal) in the production of electricity at thermal power plants in Ukraine. Entered into force in May 2016. It is believed that the beneficiaries of this formula are Rynat Akhmetov and Petro Poroshenko.

June 11, 2016 - "The President's conflict with Andrii Sadov, the beginning of the garbage blockade of Lviv."

The reason for the conflict was that the "Self-Help" faction refused to vote for the presidential bill on amendments to the Constitution in the area of justice. A fire broke out at the local landfill, as a result of which 3 rescuers died. The landfill was closed, and local councils of Lviv Oblast and other regions refused to accept Lviv garbage at the behest of Bankova. As a result, cars with Lviv garbage traveled all over Ukraine and took out garbage, and this negatively affected the ratings of Sadovoy and his Samopomich party. At the beginning of the election campaign, the mayor of Lviv, Andriy Sadovy, said that in 2016, Petro Poroshenko offered him to conclude an agreement on solving the garbage problem in Lviv in exchange for the political loyalty of his Samopomich faction in the parliament.

December 12, 2016 - "Publication of audio tapes of fugitive oligarch Onishchenko" .

Oleksandr Onishchenko, a former business partner of Petro Poroshenko and coordinator of the majority in the parliament, started publishing a series of compromising materials on the President and his corrupt entourage. The tapes contained information about the political corruption of the Ukrainian establishment, the amount of political bribes for politicians, Poroshenko's relations with other oligarchs, influence on law enforcement agencies, etc. Two years ago, "Onyshchenko's tapes" did not gain wide public resonance, as this information was not disseminated by the oligarchic channels 1+1, INTER, ISTV, Ukraine. However, before the end of the election campaign, Oleksandr Onishchenko plans to publish another batch of incriminating material on Petro Poroshenko. According to available information, these will be films about how Poroshenko took away the gas business from Rynata Akhmetov.

March 13, 2017 - "The beginning of an active conflict with then Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen Avakov" .

At the beginning of 2017, the President launched a systematic fight against Avakov with the help of NABU and controlled nationalist groups. At the same time, Poroshenko began to seek Avakov's resignation, but he did not achieve his goal. The conflict between Poroshenko and Avakov became open during the start of the election campaign.

January 14, 2018 - "Maldive vacation of the President with his family" .

Paradoxically, it was this vacation scandal, and not the corruption scandals, that brought the heaviest rating and image losses for Poroshenko. After this scandal, according to the Rating group, the level of political distrust of Poroshenko increased by 20%.

March 15, 2017 - "Blockade of Donbas".

The joint political decision of Petro Poroshenko and Oleksandr Turchynov was put into effect by the NSDC almost two years ago, and led to the severing of socio-economic contacts with the uncontrolled territories of Donbas, as well as to economic damages and losses.

February 16, 2019 - "Decision of the Constitutional Court on amnesty regarding illegal enrichment."

The initiator of this decision was Petro Poroshenko, which reversed the gains of the anti-corruption reform. In fact, the Constitutional Court is under the control of the President.

March 17, 2019 - "Corruption scandal in Ukroboronprom" .

The journalistic investigation about corruption in the defense sector caused a great political resonance due to the appearance in it of the closest friend and partner of the President - Ihor Gladkovskii-Svynarchuk. Because of this scandal, Petro Poroshenko lost 2-3% of ratings, undermined the trust of Western partners and donors. Poroshenko also had problems with nationalists from the "National Corps", who attend his events and demand to punish the corrupt.

Persons who should have responded to corruption schemes during his tenure:

1. GPU

- General Prosecutor of Ukraine (19.06.2014 — 10.02.2015) Vitaly Yarema.

- Prosecutor General of Ukraine (February 10, 2015 — April 3, 2016) Viktor Shokin.

- Prosecutor General of Ukraine (2016—2019) Yuriy Lutsenko.

2. NABU

- Director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (2015—2022) Artem Sytnyk.

3. DBR

- Director of the DBR (2017-2019) Roman Truba.

Sources:

All criminal cases of Poroshenko. Let's talk briefly

Poroshenko and suspicion of treason. Five important things to know